Anonymous
0 games, 8 posts in 6 topics
Recents posts ...
11/10, 2009 08:06PM
Anonymous
8 posts
Posted in Bug reports, new ideas - bug in new point system
hello, I have just won the game with 3,4 milion, 100 points,
Seccond was Overlama with 3,2 milons, 96 points,
but server gave victory point to Overlama.... wierd
Hassan
Seccond was Overlama with 3,2 milons, 96 points,
but server gave victory point to Overlama.... wierd
Hassan
11/04, 2009 09:30PM
Anonymous
8 posts
Posted in Bug reports, new ideas - Re:Proposes on game mechanics: One-Way-Train-Check & CV-Calculation
Your propose is wery interesting, but all of it depends on game mechanics... And i afraid, that this mechanics programed by Microprose (or who programed TTD), and cant be changed without reprograming the game code. So, thats why I see only rules/moderator control of this tricks.
And GoalBot can only drain statistic from the game (IMHO) to calculate victory conditions.
And GoalBot can only drain statistic from the game (IMHO) to calculate victory conditions.
11/04, 2009 07:51PM
Anonymous
8 posts
Posted in Bug reports, new ideas - Proposes on game mechanics: One-Way-Train-Check & CV-Calculation
Hallo there Ed & Wakoo ,
I want to propose some "new" features:
1. One-Way-Train-Check
Check, if the train that is sold was used as One-way-Train. maybe it can be achieved by checking the "train delivery history", if thats possible. Warn the player and disable the sell-Feature for this train on that depot
A way around that complex algorithm is to check if the trains life is between ... lets say 1month-12month... and disable the sell feature in between that time.
(By letting 1month be possible you can "undo" the buying of a train, if you have clicked wrong :)
2. CV-Calculation of Trains
As mentioned by Kitaro in his post, the misuse of buying trains to push the CV is annoying. I propose the changing of the CV-calculation algorithm. Lets think about something like:
When a train is bought the CV doesnt change, (maybe drops even because thecompany has less cash!). So the player has to think hard, when to buy a new one!
I hope everyone understands this, as i not a native speaker as well! :D
What do you think about this?
H.a.n.d. (have a nice day)
JStaxton
I want to propose some "new" features:
1. One-Way-Train-Check
Check, if the train that is sold was used as One-way-Train. maybe it can be achieved by checking the "train delivery history", if thats possible. Warn the player and disable the sell-Feature for this train on that depot
A way around that complex algorithm is to check if the trains life is between ... lets say 1month-12month... and disable the sell feature in between that time.
(By letting 1month be possible you can "undo" the buying of a train, if you have clicked wrong :)
2. CV-Calculation of Trains
As mentioned by Kitaro in his post, the misuse of buying trains to push the CV is annoying. I propose the changing of the CV-calculation algorithm. Lets think about something like:
When a train is bought the CV doesnt change, (maybe drops even because thecompany has less cash!). So the player has to think hard, when to buy a new one!
I hope everyone understands this, as i not a native speaker as well! :D
What do you think about this?
H.a.n.d. (have a nice day)
JStaxton
11/04, 2009 07:39PM
Anonymous
8 posts
Posted in Bug reports, new ideas - Re:Propose new rule.
Hello Kitaro,
I agree completely there with you! Nobody does this for another reason than pushing the CV! It should be forbidden by rules.
But in addtion to that see my feature propose.
Have a nice day!
JStaxton
I agree completely there with you! Nobody does this for another reason than pushing the CV! It should be forbidden by rules.
But in addtion to that see my feature propose.
Have a nice day!
JStaxton
11/04, 2009 10:34AM
Anonymous
8 posts
Posted in Bug reports, new ideas - Propose new rule.
Sorry, i am not native speaker, so my english is not very good.
I propose to prohibit by rules pumping up company values by buying locomotives, as it is not fair play. At least it is my IMHO.
Here is screen shot of my game with another competitor. I am understand, that i have not a single chance to win, but i can earn more point, if game continues, as it has to be. But by buying locomotives my competitor made +35% (on high speed !!!!!), and game overs....
[img]http://194.187.50.224/trains.jpg[/img]
I propose to prohibit by rules pumping up company values by buying locomotives, as it is not fair play. At least it is my IMHO.
Here is screen shot of my game with another competitor. I am understand, that i have not a single chance to win, but i can earn more point, if game continues, as it has to be. But by buying locomotives my competitor made +35% (on high speed !!!!!), and game overs....
[img]http://194.187.50.224/trains.jpg[/img]
10/31, 2009 06:08PM
Anonymous
8 posts
Posted in Bug reports, new ideas - map generation
Server generate same map all the time. Not only type, but exactly the same...
10/28, 2009 02:41PM
Anonymous
8 posts
Posted in Bug reports, new ideas - Re:joining problems
any ideas why i suffer desync ?
10/24, 2009 05:38PM
Anonymous
8 posts
Posted in Bug reports, new ideas - Server half crash up
It happens third time in a week now. Server is running normally, just score bot isnt reponding to commands and he does not end the game.
Can it be fixed or its just bad luck?
Can it be fixed or its just bad luck?