Fryse
61 games, 16 posts in 8 topics
Recents games ...
| Since | Scenario | Won by |
|---|---|---|
| 11 years ago |  Steam Age |
Fryse with 221 points |
| 11 years ago |  Artic |
Fryse with 521 points |
| 11 years ago | Artic |
Fryse with 292 points |
| 13 years ago |  ToyLand |
Fryse with 435 points |
| 13 years ago |  Desertic |
Fryse with 100 points |
| 13 years ago | Steam Age |
Fryse with 100 points |
| 13 years ago |  High Speed |
Fryse with 100 points |
| 13 years ago | Artic |
Fryse with 116 points |
| 13 years ago | High Speed |
David081 with 76 points |
| 14 years ago | Artic |
Fryse with 100 points |
Recents posts ...
05/26, 2010 12:04AM
Fryse
16 posts
Posted in Bug reports, new ideas - Re:New idea: Point system
anyhow.. i see now that the scoreboard isnt updating no more..
hasnt in a long time..
we are still in may, and it hasnt been updates since for a long time.
i just won a game, and i am still booked with 2 wins of 8 games.
i should off have 3 out of 10 or something.
ye, i know ive played sucky, but ive started later in most games, and ye, i did suck in a couple of them. or the competition just was way better. :P
good night from Norway.
hasnt in a long time..
we are still in may, and it hasnt been updates since for a long time.
i just won a game, and i am still booked with 2 wins of 8 games.
i should off have 3 out of 10 or something.
ye, i know ive played sucky, but ive started later in most games, and ye, i did suck in a couple of them. or the competition just was way better. :P
good night from Norway.
05/24, 2010 01:11PM
Fryse
16 posts
Posted in Bug reports, new ideas - Re:New idea: Point system
hmm.. is it implented yet, or not?
i joined several years later than the others, and won, by very close, but i won.. i still got 100 points, even if i played less time than the others, and i am ranked lower than the other.... just printscreen of the text tho, cause i was to slow..
i would actually got 150 points or something if i had came in 2nd. very strange.. isnt it? :)
[img]http://fryse.net/bilder/morescore.jpg[/img]
i joined several years later than the others, and won, by very close, but i won.. i still got 100 points, even if i played less time than the others, and i am ranked lower than the other.... just printscreen of the text tho, cause i was to slow..
i would actually got 150 points or something if i had came in 2nd. very strange.. isnt it? :)
[img]http://fryse.net/bilder/morescore.jpg[/img]
04/05, 2010 09:13PM
Fryse
16 posts
Posted in Bug reports, new ideas - Re:New idea: Point system
sorry for late reply, but have been busy with RLstuff.
Havnt been playing the last month, and wont the next either... Tbh i think ill be back next fall. (6months or so).
perhaps earlier, but i doubt.
The question where u asked me where it stopped for me to understand in the spreadsheet i would say all of it.
Neither have i espessially time to read it.. (no, didnt read note).
Good luck hunting for a system that will work perfect. I think it would be great if a low ranked player would get payed richly with points if he beats a highranked player or 2, so that the players that are skillfull might be high, not only the once that have time to play 500 games each month. Hard to stay at top tho. hence u get very litle points, and have to win twice the many games as others to get more points to still have the 1st. spot... or something.. hmm... well well, im off again, was just in to check. Cya later guys :)
Havnt been playing the last month, and wont the next either... Tbh i think ill be back next fall. (6months or so).
perhaps earlier, but i doubt.
The question where u asked me where it stopped for me to understand in the spreadsheet i would say all of it.
Neither have i espessially time to read it.. (no, didnt read note).
Good luck hunting for a system that will work perfect. I think it would be great if a low ranked player would get payed richly with points if he beats a highranked player or 2, so that the players that are skillfull might be high, not only the once that have time to play 500 games each month. Hard to stay at top tho. hence u get very litle points, and have to win twice the many games as others to get more points to still have the 1st. spot... or something.. hmm... well well, im off again, was just in to check. Cya later guys :)
03/06, 2010 08:28PM
Fryse
16 posts
Posted in Bug reports, new ideas - Re:New idea: Point system
to be hounest, i do not understand theese spreadsheets, but nice to see that you look into a new/improved point system. Good luck :)
02/09, 2010 05:30AM
Fryse
16 posts
Posted in Bug reports, new ideas - Re:New idea: Point system
Also, i would suggest that the winner of games with more people than himself, should get more points, than winner in a game he plays alone...
I would think of something so easy as:
((number of players in game-1) *10) + 100 (wich is the points today), wich will give u 10 points extra for each opponent u beat.
6players:
((6-1)*10)+100 = 150points. Then i was thinking of previous suggestion, if player has beaten 2 players higher ranked than him (and played same time) u could either 1:. Give an extra amount of 20 points pr higher ranked player he beats, OR 2:. get some % part of difference in points of the players he beaten compared to own score.. tho this can give some insane score results wich must be capped.
What u think guys?
I would think of something so easy as:
((number of players in game-1) *10) + 100 (wich is the points today), wich will give u 10 points extra for each opponent u beat.
6players:
((6-1)*10)+100 = 150points. Then i was thinking of previous suggestion, if player has beaten 2 players higher ranked than him (and played same time) u could either 1:. Give an extra amount of 20 points pr higher ranked player he beats, OR 2:. get some % part of difference in points of the players he beaten compared to own score.. tho this can give some insane score results wich must be capped.
What u think guys?
02/09, 2010 05:12AM
Fryse
16 posts
Posted in Bug reports, new ideas - New idea: Point system
Hello.
I was thinking, it is rather boring that winner allways get 100 points, even WHEN beating way better ranked competition.
How bout points to the winner of game is calculated also with his current points and or rank, compared to whom he beat in the game?
For example, a player that have 200 points allready, win a game vs 4 guys having more points, shouldn't the winner then get a litle bonus?
He has just beaten 4 guys with more points than him in the game. Tho the rules of calculating the points have to be calculating in all time of all companies.
Tho exactly how the formula will be im not sure of, but some matemathic genious must be in theese forums.
And ofc set a maxlimit to the score, of feks 300, (or 500? :P) wich is what a "newbie" or lowranked player deserve for beating a "top ranked player".
Just an idea, making it more fun for new users, and lower ranked player to "catch" up, if they dont play 5000 games a year.
I was thinking, it is rather boring that winner allways get 100 points, even WHEN beating way better ranked competition.
How bout points to the winner of game is calculated also with his current points and or rank, compared to whom he beat in the game?
For example, a player that have 200 points allready, win a game vs 4 guys having more points, shouldn't the winner then get a litle bonus?
He has just beaten 4 guys with more points than him in the game. Tho the rules of calculating the points have to be calculating in all time of all companies.
Tho exactly how the formula will be im not sure of, but some matemathic genious must be in theese forums.
And ofc set a maxlimit to the score, of feks 300, (or 500? :P) wich is what a "newbie" or lowranked player deserve for beating a "top ranked player".
Just an idea, making it more fun for new users, and lower ranked player to "catch" up, if they dont play 5000 games a year.
02/07, 2010 08:49AM
Fryse
16 posts
Posted in Bug reports, new ideas - Re:Train AI / depots
also note that the trains dont do 90degres turns.. as if u make a trun in, then a depot with a new turn, it wont go there... atlesat i think it was like that.. not sure tho if its changed or never been like that, played on many servers..
02/07, 2010 08:40AM
Fryse
16 posts
Posted in General Discussion - Re:Ban/kick request
still, a train that crush a bus or a tram thingy, will get poor reputation, so the %thingy u got on the stations connected to theese towns get down, so u get less cargo/passengars... very much down.. down to 8% or something like that, compared to usual 75-90%. Atleast this is so for passengars/mail route. Not sure for cargo, when ive never experienced it in cargo.. or was that only train to train crash when signalligts are removed so trains crash? Hmm, now i got unsecure here, but anyhow, i guess its not positive to crush trams with his trains.
Did a litle test now, in solo player, and yes, the %thingy was set from 75% -> 8% when my train rammed my bus, wich i placed there to test.. Bad for reputation, bad for buisniss, and bad if there are serveral others fightning for the cargo.
Did a litle test now, in solo player, and yes, the %thingy was set from 75% -> 8% when my train rammed my bus, wich i placed there to test.. Bad for reputation, bad for buisniss, and bad if there are serveral others fightning for the cargo.
11/18, 2009 05:40AM
Fryse
16 posts
Posted in Bug reports, new ideas - Re:bug: goalbot.
howcome i cant see your postreply here wakoo?
even tho it says before opening the forumtread that u where the last to write an answer/post.
or did i see wrong? hmmm... its late.. night
even tho it says before opening the forumtread that u where the last to write an answer/post.
or did i see wrong? hmmm... its late.. night
11/15, 2009 08:11PM
Fryse
16 posts
Posted in Bug reports, new ideas - Re:bug in new point system
yes, and it seems the bot isnt handling the fact that the 2nd guy can be bigger than 1st guy, so the bot isnt checking for the largest company value, hes just checking IF the leading person lasttime is now over the limit. IF hes over the limit, he will be the winner, even tho another company is bigger.
I have a few screenshots of it aswell, but i wrote it in the wrong place.. i wrote it under general: "Bug: Goalbot."
Hopefully they will see into it, and perhaps give us a few points for the mistakes... we can allways hope :)
I have a few screenshots of it aswell, but i wrote it in the wrong place.. i wrote it under general: "Bug: Goalbot."
Hopefully they will see into it, and perhaps give us a few points for the mistakes... we can allways hope :)